SR
Eikon Basilike: The Pourtraicture of His Sacred Majestie in His Solitudes and Sufferings/Book 1 · Eikon Basilike: The Pourtraicture of His Sacred Majestie in His Solitudes and Sufferings
Chapter 16EikonBas.1.16

Upon the Ordinance against the Common Prayer-Book

The Danger of Novelty

The author critiques the tendency of reformers to discard established wisdom in favor of popular novelty.

It's nothing new to have every innovation ushered in under the name of reformation in church and state by people who, seeking a reputation with the common crowd for their extraordinary gifts and piety, feel they must undo whatever was formerly established, no matter how well and wisely.1 So scarcely can the pride of those who pursue novelties allow former times any share or degree of wisdom or godliness. And because prayer and devotion to God rightly make up so large a part of religion—being the soul's more immediate conversation with the divine Majesty—nothing could be more persuasive to the people than to tell them they were serving God wrongly on that point.

The Defense of Set Liturgy

The author defends the Book of Common Prayer, arguing that set forms of prayer are both scriptural and conducive to true devotion.

So our public Liturgy, or forms of set constant prayer, must not be amended—in whatever free and public counsel might seem to sober people inconvenient in substance or form, to which I would readily agree—but wholly discarded and abolished; and after many public insults had been offered to the Book and to those who used it according to their consciences and the laws then in force, it must be crucified by an Ordinance, the better to please either those men who prided themselves on their gift for improvised, fluent prayer, or others who, aware of their own formality in using it, thought they fully atoned for their sin of not using it rightly by laying all the blame on it and totally rejecting it as a dead letter, thereby excusing the deadness of their hearts. As for the content of the book, sober and learned men have more than adequately defended it against the quibbles and objections of those who thought it a mark of piety to raise every irreverent objection they could—especially charges of Popery and superstition—when there is no doubt that the Liturgy was carefully conformed to the doctrine of the Church of England, which all the Reformed churches acknowledge as most sound and orthodox. As for using set and prescribed forms, there's no doubt that wholesome words, once they're known and suited to people's understanding, are most readily received into their hearts, and are most apt to stir up and carry with them judicious and fervent affections. I don't see any reason why Christians should grow tired of a well-composed liturgy (as I consider this one to be), any more than they would of anything else where constant use doesn't diminish its excellence or usefulness. I could never see any reason why any Christian should abhor, or be forbidden to use, the same forms of prayer, since he prays to the same God, believes in the same Savior, professes the same truths, reads the same Scriptures, has the same duties upon him, and for the most part feels the same daily needs, both inward and outward, which are common to the whole Church.2 We should certainly know what we are praying for just as well as we know who we are praying to—and understand the wording just as well as the meaning. When we want the same things, what is stopping us from using the same words? Our appetite and digestion can still be good when we use, as we pray for, our daily bread. Some men, I hear, are so eager to use their own invention and gifts in all their devotions that they not only stop using the Lord's Prayer (as too many do) but cast it away entirely and despise it—whose great guilt is that it is the warrant and original pattern of all set liturgies in the Christian Church. I've always thought that the proud display of human inventiveness and the vain affectation of varied wording in public prayer or any sacred service deserves a greater mark of sin than what people call coldness or barrenness. Furthermore, when it comes to their hearts, people are no less prone to formal and superficial attitudes in those novelties than they are when using set forms, where it isn't the words but the people's hearts that are to blame. I don't doubt that someone can be very formal even when using improvised words, or deeply devout while using familiar expressions. God isn't a God of variety any more than He is a God of constancy. Fixed forms of prayer aren't any more likely to dull or hinder the spirit of prayer and devotion than an unplanned, confused variety is likely to scatter and lose it.

The Failure of Extempore Prayer

The author highlights the practical and spiritual dangers of relying on individual ministerial gifts rather than the collective wisdom of the Church.

Though I'm not against a grave, modest, discreet, and humble use of ministers' gifts, even in public, the better to fit and stir their own and the people's affections to the present occasions, yet I know no necessity why private and individual abilities should completely jostle out and deprive the Church of the joint abilities and concurrent gifts of many learned and godly men—such as the composers of the Service Book were—who may in all reason be thought to have more gifts and graces enabling them to compose, with serious deliberation and shared counsel, such forms of prayer as may best fit the Church's common needs, inform the hearers' understanding, and stir up that trusting and fervent application of their spirits (in which the very life and soul of prayer consists, and that so much claimed Spirit of prayer) than any private man, by his solitary abilities, can be presumed to have; and what those private abilities often are—even where they make a great noise and show—the affectations, emptiness, irrelevance, rudeness, confusions, flatness, levity, obscurity, vain and ridiculous repetitions, the senseless and often blasphemous expressions, all these burdened with a most tedious and intolerable length, sufficiently convince everyone except those who glory in that Pharisaic way.3 In such cases men must be strangely shameless, and flatterers of themselves, not to feel boundless shame for what they do and say in matters so sacred, before God and the Church, in so ridiculous—and indeed profane—a manner. Nor can you expect anything else: in duties done over and over—such as sacramental administrations and the like, which remain the same—ministers must either settle into using their own forms constantly, which are unlikely to be as sound or as fully equal to the nature of the duty as forms of public composition; or else they must strive for new expressions every time when the subject is the same. Even in anyone's greatest abilities, it can hardly be assumed that they won't often lack much of the completeness, order, and gravity those duties deserve. By this means, those duties are exposed at every celebration to every minister's private weaknesses, unfitness, errors, disorders, and defects—both in judgment and in expression. A serious awareness of the problems in the Church—which inevitably follow when everyone conducts services in their own way—no doubt first moved the wisdom and piety of the ancient Churches to remedy those harms by using fixed liturgies composed for public use.4 I believe this Church will feel that lack keenly enough when the unhappy fruits of many people's unchecked ignorance and self-assured failings show themselves in even more errors, schisms, disorders, and uncharitable divisions in religion—of which there are already far too many, and that is a great pity.56

The Injustice of Forced Innovation

The author denounces the hypocrisy of those who demand liberty of conscience for themselves while suppressing the conscience of others through the abolition of the Common Prayer Book.

However, if violence must necessarily introduce and support these innovations—just so people don't seem to have nothing to do—which Law, Reason, and Religion forbid, at least they shouldn't be forced on us so completely that they shove the public Liturgy out entirely. Yet nothing can excuse the deeply unjust and one-sided severity of those who either recently subscribed to, used, and upheld the Service Book, or refused to use it and cried out against the strictness of the laws and bishops who wouldn't allow them the liberty of their consciences in choosing not to use it. That these men, I say, should so suddenly change the Liturgy into a Directory—as if the Spirit needed help inventing the content, though not the wording; or as if prescribed matter did not limit and obstruct the Spirit just as much as if it were clothed in, and confined to, fixed words (so slight and easy is that sleight of hand which will serve to delude ordinary people).7 And further, that they should use such severity as not to allow anyone, without penalty, to use the Common Prayer Book in public—even though their consciences bind them to it as a duty of piety to God and of obedience to the laws. So I see that no men are more prone to become greater tyrants, and more rigorous enforcers pressing others to conform to their illegal novelties, than those whose pride was formerly least inclined to obey lawful constitutions, and whose licentious tempers most claimed the cover of conscientious liberties—a freedom they now, with much regret, allow to me and my chaplains when they may have leave to serve me, whose abilities, even in their extemporaneous way, do not fall short of the others, but whose modesty and learning far exceed most of them. But this matter is of so popular a nature that some men knew it would not bear learned and sober debate, lest, once convinced by the evidence of reason as well as of the laws, they should have been driven either to sin more against their knowledge by taking away the Liturgy, or to displease some faction of the people by continuing its use. Though I believe they have offended more considerable men—not only for their numbers and estates, but for their weighty and judicious piety—than those whose weakness or giddiness they sought to gratify by taking it away. One of the greatest faults some men found with the Book of Common Prayer, I believe, was this: that it taught them to pray so often for me—petitions to which they didn't have enough loyalty to say Amen, nor yet enough charity to refrain from reproaches, and even cursings of me in their own forms, instead of praying for me. I wish their repentance may be their only punishment; that, seeing the harms which the disuse of public liturgies has already produced, they may restore to them that standing, use, and reverence which the ancient churches gave to set forms of sound and wholesome words.

A Prayer for Unity and Wisdom

The chapter concludes with a devotional prayer asking God to restore order, unity, and true inward piety to the Church.

And you, O Lord, who are the same God, blessed forever, whose mercies are full of variety and yet of constancy: You do not deny us a new and fresh sense of our old and daily needs, nor do You despise renewed affections joined to constant expressions.8 Let us not lack the benefit of your churches' united and well-advised devotions. May the substance of our prayers align with your will, which is always the same, and the fervor of our spirits match the movements of your Holy Spirit within us. We don't doubt that your spiritual perfections are such that you're neither pleased by affected novelties in content or style, nor offended by the pious constancy of our petitions in both. You haven't forbidden or commanded their variety or constancy anywhere, but have left them to the piety and prudence of your Church, so that both may be used and neither despised. Keep people in that pious moderation of judgment in matters of religion, so that their ignorance may not offend others, nor their opinion of their own abilities tempt them to deprive others of what they may lawfully and devoutly use to help their weaknesses. Since error thrives on novelty and variety, while truth thrives on unity and constancy, don't let your Church be plagued by errors or deformed by indecencies in your service under the pretense of variety and novelty. Nor let it be deprived of truth, unity, and order under this fallacy: that constancy is the cause of formality.9 Lord, keep us from formal hypocrisy in our own hearts, and then we know that praying to you, or praising you (with David and other holy men) in the same forms cannot hurt us. Give us the wisdom to fix what is wrong within us, and there will be less to mend outside of us.10 Always defend and deliver your Church from the effects of blind zeal and overbold devotion.

Read the original Latin

It is no newes to have all Innovations ushered in with the name of Reformations in Church and State, by those, who seeking to gain reputation with the Vulgar for their extraordinary parts, and piety, must needs undoe what ever was formerly setled never so well and wisely.

So hardly can the pride of those that study Novelties, allow former times any share or degree of wisedom or godliness.

And because matter of prayer and devotion to God justly bears a great part in Religion, (being the soules more immediate converse with the divine Majesty) nothing could be more plausible to the people then to tell them, they served God amiss in that point.

Hence our publike Liturgy, or Forms of constant Prayers must be (not amended, in what upon free and publick advice might seem to sober men inconvenient for matter or manner, to which I should easily consent, but) wholly cashiered, and abolished, and after many popular contempts offered to the Booke, and those that used it according to their consciences, and the Lawes in force, it must be crucified by an Ordinance the better to please either those men, who gloried in their extemporary veine and fluency: or others, who conscious to their own formality in the use of it, thought they fully expiated their sin of not using it aright, by laying all the blame upon it, and a totall rejection of it as a dead letter, thereby to excuse the deadness of their hearts.

As for the matter contained in the Book, sober and learned men have sufficiently vindicated it against the cavils and exceptions of those who thought it a part of piety to make what profane objections they could against it; especially for Popery and Superstition; whereas no doubt the Liturgy was exactly conformed to the doctrine of the Church of England; & this by all Reformed Churches is confessed to be most sound and Orthodox.

For the manner of using set and prescribed Forms, there is no doubt but that wholsome words being known and fitted to mens understandings, are soonest received into their hearts, and aptest to excite and carry along with them judicious and fervent affections.

Nor doe I see any reason why Christians should be weary of a well-composed Liturgie (as I hold this to be) more then of all other things, wherein the constancy abates nothing of the excellency and usefulness.

I could never see any Reason, why any Christian should abhor, or be forbidden to use the same Forms of prayer, since he prayes to the same God, believes in the same Saviour, professeth the same Truths, reads the same Scriptures, hath the same duties upon him, and feels the same daily wants for the most part, both inward and outward, which are common to the whole Church.

Sure we may as well beforehand know what we pray, as to whom we pray; and in what word, as to what sense; when we desire the same things, what hinders we may not use the same words? our appetite and digestion too may be good, when we use, as we pray for, our daily bread.

Some men, I hear, are so impatient not to use in all their devotions their own invention and gifts, that they not only disuse (as too many) but wholly cast away and contemn the Lords Prayer: whose great guilt is, that it is the warrant and originall patern of all set Liturgies in the Christian Church.

I ever thought that the proud ostentation of mens abilities for invention, and the vain affectation of variety for expressions, in publike prayer, or any sacred administrations, merits a greater brand of sin, then that which they call coldness and Barrenness: Nor are men in those novelties less subject to formall and superficiall tempers, (as to their hearts) then in the use of constant Forms, where not the words, but mens hearts are to blame.

I make no doubt but a man may be very formall in the most extemporary variety; & very fervently devout in the most wonted expressions: Nor is God more a God of variety, than of constancy: Nor are constant Forms of prayers more likely to flat, and hinder the Spirit of Prayer and Devotion, than an unpremeditated and confused variety, to distract and lose it.

Though I am not against a grave, modest, discreet, and humble use of Ministers gifts, even in publique, the better to fit, and excite their owne, and the peoples affections to the present occasions: yet I know no necessity why private and single abilities should quite justle out, & deprive the Church of the joynt abilities and concurrent gifts of many learned and godly men; such as the Composers of the Service-Book were; who may in all reason be thought to have more of gifts & graces enabling them to compose with serious deliberation & concurrent advice, such Forms of prayers, as may best fit the Churches common wants, inform the Hearers understanding, and stir up that fiduciary and fervent application of their spirits (wherein consists the very life and soul of prayer, and that so much pretended Spirit of prayer) then any private man by his solitary abilities, can be presumed to have; which, what they are many times (even there, where they make a great noise and shew) the affectations, emptinesse, impertinency, rudenesse, confusions, flatnesse, levity, obscurity, vain and ridiculous repetitions, the senslesse, and oft-times blasphemous expressions; all these burthened with a most tedious and intolerable length, do sufficiently convince all men, but those who glory in that Pharisaick way.

Wherein men must be strangely impudent, and flatterers of themselves, not to have an infinite shame of what they do and say, in things of so sacred a nature, before God and the Church, after so ridiculous, and indeed, profane a manner.

Nor can it be expected, but that in duties of frequent performance, as Sacramentall administrations, and the like, which are still the same; Ministers must either come to use their own Forms constantly, which are not like to be so sound, or comprehensive of the nature of the duty, as forms of publike composure; or else they must every time affect new expressions when the subject is the same; which can hardly be presumed in any mans greatest sufficiencies not to want (many times) much of that compleatnesse, order, and gravity, becoming those duties; which by this meanes are exposed at every celebration to every Ministers private infirmities, indispositions, errours, disorders, and defects, both for judgement and expression.

A serious sense of which inconvenience in the Church unavoidably following every mans severall manner of officiating, no doubt, first occasioned the wisdome and piety of the Ancient Churches, to remedy those mischiefs, by the use of constant Liturgies of publike composure.

The want of which I believe this Church will sufficiently feel, when the unhappy fruits of many mens ungoverned ignorance, and confident defects, shall be discovered in more errours, schismes, disorders, and uncharitable distractions in Religion, which are already but too many, and the more is the pitie.

However, if violence must needs bring in and abet those innovations, (that men may not seem to have nothing to do) which Law, Reason, and Religion forbids, at least to be so obtruded, as wholly to justle out the publike Liturgy;

Yet nothing can excuse that most unjust and partiall severity of those men, who either lately had subscribed to, used and maintained the Service-book; or refused to use it, cried out of the rigour of Laws and Bishops, which suffered them not to use the Liberty of their Consciences in not using it.

That these men, (I say) should so suddenly change the Liturgy into a Directory, as if the Spirit needed help for invention, though not for expressions; or as if matter prescribed did not as much stint and obstruct the Spirit, as if it were cloathed in, and confined to fit words (so slight & easie is that Legerdemain which will serve to delude the vulgar.)

That further, they should use such severity as not to suffer without penalty, any to use the Common-Prayer-Book publikely, although their consciences bind them to it, as a duty of Piety to God, and Obedience to the Laws.

Thus I see, no men are prone to be greater Tyrants, and more rigorous exactors upon others to conform to their illegall novelties, then such, whose pride was formerly least disposed to the obedience of lawfull Constitutions; and whose licentious humours most pretended consciencious liberties, which freedome, with much regret, they now allow to Me, and My Chaplains, when they may have leave to serve Me, whose abilities, even in their extemporary way comes not short of the others, but their modesty and learning far exceeds the most of them.

But this matter is of so popular a nature, as some men knew it would not bear learned and sober debates, lest being convinced by the evidence of Reason, as well as Laws, they should have been driven either to sin more against their knowledge, by taking away the Liturgie; or to displease some faction of the people, by continuing the use of it.

Though, I beleeve, they have offended more considerable men, not onely for their numbers and estates, but for their weighty and judicious piety, then those are, whose weaknesse or giddinesse they sought to gratifie by taking it away.

One of the greatest faults some men found with the Common-Prayer-Book, I beleeve, was this, That it taught them to pray so oft for Me; to which Petitions they had not Loyaltie enough to say Amen, nor yet Charitie enough to forbear Reproaches, and even Cursings of Me in their own Forms, in stead of praying for Me.

I wish their repentance may be their onely punishment; that seeing the mischiefs, which the disuse of publick Liturgies hath already produced, they may restore that credit, use and reverence to them, which by the ancient Churches were given to set Forms of sound and wholsom words.

And thou, O Lord, which art the same God, blessed for ever, whose Mercies are full of varietie, and yet of constancie; Thou deniest us not a new and fresh sense of our old and daily wants nor despisest renewed affections joyned to constant expressions.

Let us not want the benefit of thy Churches united and well advised Devotions.

Let the matters of our praiers be agreeable to thy will which is always the same, and the fervency of our spirits to the motions of thy holy Spirit in us.

And then we doubt not, but thy spirituall perfections are such as thou art neither to be pleased with affected Novelties for matter or manner, nor offended with the pious constancy of our petitions in them both.

Whose varietie or constancie thou hast no where either forbidden or commanded but left them to the piety and prudence of thy Church, that both may be used, neither despised.

Keep men in that pious moderation of their judgements in matters of Religion; that their ignorance may not offend others, nor their opinion of their own abilities tempt them to deprive others of what they may lawfully and devoutly use, to help their infirmities.

And since the advantage of Error consists in novelty & variety, as truths in unity and constancy: Suffer not thy Church to be pestered with errours, and deformed with undecencies in thy service, under the pretence of variety and noveltie. Nor to be deprived of truth, unitie, and order under this fallacy, That constancie is the cause of formality.

Lord, keepe us from formall Hypocrisie in our own Hearts, and then we know that praying to thee, or praising of thee (with David, and other Holy men) in the same formes cannot hurt us.

Give us wisdom to amend what is amiss within us, and there will be less to mend without us.

Evermore defend and deliver thy Church from the effects of blind zeale and over-bold devotion.

Scripture echoes

  1. Matt.6.11;Luke.11.3Give us today our daily bread. Luke.11.3 — Give us each day our daily bread.
  2. 2Tim.1.13Hold fast to the pattern of sound words that you heard from me, in the faith and love that are in Christ Jesus.

Notes

  1. 1Source 'Vulgar' means the common people/crowd, not modern 'crude'; 'parts' means gifts or abilities; 'never so well and wisely' is the Early Modern idiom for 'however well and wisely.'
  2. 2Early Modern 'wants' rendered as 'needs' (lacks/necessities), not modern 'desires'.
  3. 3Period sense: of faith/trust, not modern legal trusteeship. Rendered as 'trusting' for the interior act of prayer.
  4. 4Early modern 'constant' here means settled/fixed rather than continuous; 'publike composure' means forms composed for public use (publicly authorized composition), not emotional composure.
  5. 5Early modern 'confident defects' points to failings born of presumption/overconfidence, not mere assurance of quality; rendered as 'self-assured failings'.
  6. 6Here 'distractions' means divisive pullings-apart in the Church, not wandering thoughts; rendered as 'divisions'.
  7. 7Invention / expressions echoes the classical inventio vs. elocutio contrast: the Directory prescribed topics and order but not set prayer-wording; the complaint is that prescribed content constrains the Spirit no less than prescribed words.
  8. 8Source 'wants' is Early Modern English for lacks/necessities; rendered as 'needs' so modern readers do not hear mere desires.
  9. 9formality keeps the period sense of empty, mechanical observance, not mere ceremony as such.
  10. 10Source 'without us' means exteriorly / outside us (not 'lacking us'); the within/without contrast is retained as within/outside.

Eikon Basilike: The Pourtraicture of His Sacred Majestie in His Solitudes and Sufferings companion

A prayer for every moment, already on your phone

Chosen Portion puts a curated historic prayer in front of you each day — so the words are there before the moment arrives.

Chosen Portion is the digital descendant of the carried prayer book: the short daily prayers this collection preserves, delivered one a day to your pocket.

  • One short, memorable prayer delivered daily — build your repertoire a card at a time
  • Prayers matched to real situations: fear, gratitude, decisions, grief, sleep
  • Save favourites into your personal pocket collection you can open anywhere
Chosen Portion — Daily Prayer (free iOS app)