SR
Chapter 98GilesRP.1.98

Liber II, Pars II — Quas scientias addiscere filii nobilium, et maxime filii regum, et principum. Cap. VIII.

Liber II, Pars II — Quas scientias addiscere filii nobilium, et maxime filii regum, et principum. Cap. VIII.

There are seven sciences that are renowned among the ancients, as the ancient authority testifies. Such are these. They are Grammar, Dialectic, Rhetoric, Music, Arithmetic, Geometry, and Astronomy. These are called the liberal arts because the sons of the noble and free were educated in them. For the sons of nobles first learned Grammar. Grammar was established according to Alpharabium, so that one does not err in language and does not sin in speech. We learn Latin through Grammar, which is the language of the Philosophers; for in this language, the Philosophers transmitted their knowledge. Therefore, if we cannot on our own find all scientific knowledge, but need the help of Philosophers and Doctors, it is essential for us to know that language in which the Doctors and Philosophers have spoken; and since it is known through Grammar, Grammar must be counted among the liberal arts, because the sons of the noble and free were instructed in it. The second liberal art is called dialectic, which teaches the method of arguing and counter-arguing. For our way of knowing is to demonstrate a proposition through valid arguments and sound reasoning. Therefore, it was necessary to find a science that teaches the method by which arguments and reasons are to be formed. For unless we know the method of arguing, we could err in our arguments and consequently be deceived. We might sometimes believe we are concluding correctly, and we would conclude falsely because we would be ignorant of the method of arguing. Just as grammar is necessary, which is the guide of language, so that we do not err in speaking, dialectic is necessary according to Alpharabium, which is the guide of understanding, so that we do not err in arguing. The third liberal art is called rhetoric. Rhetoric, however, is as the philosopher indicates in his works on rhetoric, a kind of coarse dialectic. For just as subtle arguments must be made in the natural sciences and in other speculative sciences, so too must there be coarse arguments in moral sciences, which deal with practical matters. Therefore, just as dialectic was necessary, teaching the method of subtle and forceful argumentation, so too was rhetoric necessary, which is a kind of coarse dialectic that teaches the method of gross and figurative argumentation. This is necessary for the children of the free and noble, especially for kings and princes, because it is essential for them to maintain their position among nations and to rule over the people, who can only grasp coarse and figurative arguments. The fourth liberal art is said to be Music. This is according to the Philosopher. 8. In the Politics. This is fitting for young people, especially for the children of the free and noble, due to many reasons. One reason is that children can't endure anything distressing: therefore, if they are to be granted any pleasures, it's fitting that they should be directed toward innocent delights. According to the same philosopher, music is suited to the nature of youth because they have innocent pleasures. A second reason for this could be that, as the philosopher suggests, it is fitting for youth to engage in such activities. Aristotle. The human mind cannot be idle. Therefore, it seems good to sometimes intersperse enjoyable musical activities that are permissible and innocent. This is especially fitting for the children of nobles, who, if they are not engaged in mechanical arts, remain idle unless they study the liberal arts and intersperse their exercises with musical delights that are both permissible and honorable. For the philosopher touches on many reasons in his Politics, through which it could be shown that it is fitting for the children of nobles to learn music; but this will be discussed further below. The fifth liberal art is said to be arithmetic, which teaches the proportions of numbers, and to which the children of nobles were likely introduced because music cannot be understood without it. The sixth liberal art is geometry, which teaches how to understand measurements and quantities of things. However, the sons of nobles were perhaps taught this because astronomy, which deals with the quantity of stars and the substance of celestial bodies, cannot be perfectly understood without it. The seventh liberal art is said to be astronomy, around which the sons of nobles perhaps labored in ancient times because the Gentiles were overly curious about the judgments of the stars. For they never wanted to start wars or undertake any endeavors unless they first considered the ascending degree and examined the condition of the heavens; and because this is understood through astronomy, the sons of the free and noble wanted to be educated in astronomical matters. Thus, the ancients recognized the value of the liberal arts and greatly praised these seven arts. However, there are many other sciences that are far nobler than these. For Natural Philosophy, which speaks of understanding the natures of things, is far better than any of the aforementioned. But the current inquiry does not allow for declaring this, which must be coarse and figurative. Moreover, metaphysics, which deals with God and separate substances through human reasoning, is far nobler than natural philosophy and even than any of the aforementioned sciences, as the philosopher states in the first book of Metaphysics. For there is none more worthy than that which is to be understood about the sciences invented by humans, among which metaphysics holds the primacy. The broad theology, which is about God and the angels, is not only human but divine, and not through human invention but rather through divine inspiration, is far and incomparably nobler and more worthy than all others. Moreover, certain moral sciences, such as ethics, which is about self-governance, are also important. And economics, which is about the governance of the family, and politics, which is about the governance of the city and the kingdom, are very useful and necessary for the children of the nobility. Indeed, (as will become clear in the discussion) the children of the nobility, especially the sons of kings and princes, if they wish to live politically and govern others, should especially focus on these subjects. However, there are also other subordinate and foundational sciences: for example, the perfective science, which is about vision, is under geometry. Medicine, however, is under natural philosophy. Laws and rights, which pertain to human actions under politics, which is about the governance of cities. For (as we remember having said elsewhere) all lawyers are like certain political fools: for just as laypeople and commoners argue and form their own reasons, which the art of dialectic teaches them how to argue, so those who do not argue artificially and dialectically are called by the Philosopher dialectical fools; likewise, lawyers, because they speak about those things which pertain to politics, can be called political fools, as they speak narratively and without reason. From this, it can be seen that those who know political science and moral sciences should be honored more than those who know laws and rights. For the more knowledgeable and those who provide reasons are more honorable than those who speak without giving reasons: thus, those who are such are more honorable than those. From this, it can be seen who should be honored more. For first, those who are divine and know theology should be honored; because just as God himself is the God of all beings, so theology, which is primarily about God, is the goddess of all and the mistress of human sciences. After theologians, metaphysicians should be honored more: because (as was said above) among the sciences invented by humans, metaphysics holds the primacy. After these, natural philosophers should indeed be honored: because although natural philosophy is beneath metaphysics, it nonetheless holds the primacy among all other sciences invented by man. Therefore, those who are knowledgeable should be honored gradually. From these divided sciences, it can be seen that the sons of nobles, especially kings and princes, should apply themselves to certain studies. For since they ought to be like demigods, and must diligently and without negligence attend to the affairs of the kingdom, they cannot afford to explore the sciences in depth; therefore, it is fitting for them to be well-grounded in divine matters and to be instructed and firm in faith, and to know those sciences through which one knows how to govern oneself and others. Such are the moral sciences. Moreover, they should know other sciences only to the extent that they serve the moral enterprise. Therefore, they should know grammar so that they can understand the literal language, since both moral sciences and others are more easily conveyed in that language. Indeed, if grammar were never to serve the moral enterprise, it is fitting for kings and princes to know the literal language so that they can write and read their secrets without others knowing. Therefore, the sons of nobles, however they may intend to be soldiers and engage in political affairs, should apply themselves so that they know the literal language. They should also learn something about dialectic and rhetoric, so that through this they may become more refined in understanding whatever is proposed; having done this, they should fully express their entire intellect, so that they may understand moral matters well and know how to govern themselves and others. For according to the Philosopher, it is fitting for them to know about music in political matters, inasmuch as it serves to promote good morals. Therefore, it is essential to know moral matters for those who wish to lead: even if they were to ignore all other sciences, they should still study so that moral teachings can be conveyed to them in a common and straightforward manner; for through these, a leader is sufficiently instructed on how to lead and how to guide himself and his citizens toward virtue.

Read the original Latin

Septem scientias esse famosas apud antiquos, antiqua auctoritas protestatur. Huiusmodi autem sunt. Grammatica; Dialectica,Rhetorica,Musica, Arithmetica, Geometria, et Astronomia. Has autem omnes liberales vocant, eo quod filii liberorum, et nobilium ponebantur ad illas. Addiscebant enim primo filii nobilium grammaticam. Nam grammatica secundum Alpharabium inventa est, ne erretur in lingua, et ne peccetur in sermone. Addiscimus enim per grammaticam idioma latinum, quod est idioma Philosophorum: sub tali enim sermone Philosophi suam scientiam tradiderunt. Quare si per nosipsos non sufficimus ad invenienda omnia scientifica, sed indigemus ad hoc auxilio Philosophorum et Doctorum, expedit nos scire idioma illud, in quo doctores et Philosophi sunt locuti: et quia scitur per grammaticam, ideo grammatica inter liberales scientias est computanda, quia filii liberorum et nobilium instruebantur in illa.

Secunda liberalis scientia dicitur esse dialectica,quae docet modum arguendi et opponendi. Nam modus sciendi noster, est ut per debita argumenta, et per debitas rationes manifestemus propositum. Oportuit ergo invenire aliquam scientiam docentem modum, quo formanda sunt argumenta, et rationes. Nam nisi modum arguendi sciremus, possemus in arguendo peccare, et per consequens decipi. Crederemus aliquando bene concludere et concluderemus falsum: eo quod ignoraremus arguendi modum. Sicut igitur necessaria est grammatica, quae est directio linguae, ne erremus in loquendo: sic secundum Alpharabium necessaria est Dialectica, quae est directio intellectus, ne erretur in arguendo. Tertia scientia liberalis dicitur esse Rhetorica. Est autem Rhetorica,ut innuit Philosophus in Rhetoricis suis, quasi quaedam grossa dialectica.

Nam sicut fiendae sunt rationes subtiles in scientiis naturalibus et in aliis scientiis speculabilibus,sic fiendae sunt rationes grossae in scientiis moralibus, quae tractant de agibilibus. Quare sicut necessaria fuit dialectica, quae docet modum arguendi subtilem et violentiorem: sic necessaria fuit rhetorica,quae est quaedam grossa dialectica docens modum arguendi grossum et figuralem. Haec autem necessaria est filiis liberorum et nobilium, et maxime regum, et principum: quia horum est conservari inter gentes et dominari populo, qui non potest percipere nisi rationes grossas et figurales. Quarta scientia liberalis dicitur esse Musica. haec secundum Philos. 8. Polit. convenit ipsis iuvenibus, et maxime filiis liberorum, et nobilium propter rationes multas.

Quarum una est, quia pueri nihil tristabile sustinere possunt: quare si debent eis aliqua delectabilia concedi,dignum est quod ordinentur ad delectiones innocuas: quare (secundum eundem Philosophum) musica est consentanea naturae iuvenum, quia habent innocuas delectationes. Secunda ratio ad hoc idem esse potest, quia (ut Philosophus innuit in eodem 8. Poli.) mens humana nescit ociosa esse. Ideo (ut videtur) ocium bonum est aliquando interponere inter delectationes musicales, quae sunt licitae et innocuae. Maxime autem hoc decens est filiis liberorum et nobilium, qui non vacantes moechanicis artibus, remanent ociosi, nisi studerent literalibus disciplinis, et nisi suis exercitiis interponerent delectationes musicales, quae sunt licitae et honestae. Tangit enim Philosophus multas rationes in Politicis, per quas ostendi posset, quod filios nobilium decet addiscere musicam: Sed de his forte infra tangetur. Quinta scientia liberalis dicitur esse arithmetica , docens proportiones numerorum, ad quam forte filii liberorum ideo tradebantur, quia fine ea musica sciri non potest.

Sexta scientia liberalis est geometria, quae docet cognoscere mensuras et quantitates rerum. Ad hanc autem filii nobilium, ideo forte tradebantur, quia fine ea Astronomia, quae est de quantitate astrorum, et de substantia syderum, et de cursibus eorum, perfecte sciri non potest. Septima scientia liberalis dicitur esse astronomia, circa quam forte antiquitus filii nobilium ideo insudabant, quia gentiles circa iudica astrorum nimis erant curiosi. Nunquam enim volebant bella inchoare, nec aliqua opera incipere, nisi considerato gradu ascendente, et inspecta conditione caeli: et quia hoc per astronomiam cognoscitur, ideo filii liberorum et nobilium volebant in astronomicis esse instructi. Sic ergo antiqui de liberalibus senserunt, et has septem artes nimium extollebant. Veruntamen plures sunt aliae scientiae longe nobiliores istis. Nam Naturalis Philosophia dicens cognoscere naturas rerum, longe melior est, quam aliqua praedictarum. Sed hoc declarare non patitur perscrutatio praesens, quae debet esse grossa et figuralis.

Rursus et Metaphysica, quae modo humano et per rationes humanitus inventas, tractat de Deo et de substantiis separatis, longe nobilior est, quam naturalis Philosophia, et etiam quam aliqua praedictarum, de qua Philosophus ait primo Meta. quia nulla est dignior ipsa quod intelligendum est de scientiis humanitus inventis, inter quas Metaphyfica primatum tenet. Amplia Theologia, quae est de Deo et de Angelis non modo humano sed divino, et non per humanum inventionem sed magis per inspirationem divinam, longe et incomparabiliter nobilior et dignior est omnibus aliis. Adhuc quaedam morales scientiae, ut Ethica, quae est de regimine sui. et Oeconomica, quae est de regimine familiae: et Politica, quae est de regimine civitatis et regni, valde sunt utiles et necessariae filiis liberorum et nobilium. immo (ut in prosequendo patebit) filii nobilium, et maxime fiii regum et principum, si velint politice vivere, et velint alios regere et guberanre, maxime circa has debent insistere. Sunt autem et aliae scientiae subalternatae et suppositae istis: ut perfectiva, quae est de visu, est sub Geometria. Medicina vero est sub naturali Philosophia.

Leges et iura, quae sunt de actibus hominum sub politica, quae est de regimine civitatum. Nam ( ut alibi nos dixisse meminimus) omnes legistae sunt quasi quidam idiotae politici: Nam sicut laici et vulgares, quia arguunt et formant rationes suas, quem modum arguendi docet dialectica, ideo ipsi quia non arguunt artificialiter et dialectice, appellantur a Philosopho idiotae dialectici: sic Legistae, quia ea de quibus est politica, dicunt narrative et sine ratione, appellari possunt idiotae politici. Ex hoc autem patere potest quod magis honorandi sunt scientes politicam et morales scientias, quam scientes leges et iura. Nam quanto scientes et dantes causam, honorabiliores sunt loquentibus et non reddentibus causam dicti: tanto tales honorabiliores sunt illis. Ex hoc autem apparere potest, qui scientes magis sint honorandi. Nam primo honorandi sunt divini et scientes theologiam; quia sicut Deus ipse, est Deus omnium entium; sic theologia, quae principaliter est de Deo, est dea omnium, et domina humanarum scientiarum. Post theologos vero magis honorandi Metaphisici: quia (ut superius dicebatur) inter scientias humanitus inventas metaphyfica primatum tenet. Post hos quidem honorari debent naturales Philosophi: quia naturalis Philosophia licet sit infra metaphyficam, tenet tamen principatum inter omnes alias scientias inventas ab homine.

Sic ergo scientes gradatim sunt honorandi. His ergo scientiis sic divisis, de levi patere potest, circa quas scientias filii nobilium, et maxime regum, et principum debeant insudare. Nam cum oporteat eos esse quasi semideos, et debite et absque negligentia negotium regni intendere, non vacat eis subtiliter perscrutari scientias: maxime igitur decet ipsos bene se habere circa divina, et esse instructos et firmos in fide, et illas scientias scire, per quas quis se et alios novit regere et gubernare. Huiusmodi autem sunt scientiae morales. Alias ergo scientias in tantum decet eos scire, inquantum deserviunt morali negocio. Decet igitur eos scire grammaticam, ut intelligant idioma literale: secundum quod idioma tam morales scientiae quam aliae facilius traduntur. Immo si nunquam grammatica deserviret et negocio morali, decet reges, et principes scire idioma literale, ut possint secreta sua alii scribere et leger absque aliorum scitu. Filii ergo nobilium quantumcunque; intendant esse milites, et vacare negocio politico, debent insudare, ut sciant idioma literale.

Debent etiam aliquid addiscere de dialectica et rhetorica, ut ex hoc subtiliores fiant ad intelligendum quaecunque; proposita: quo facto totum suum ingenium debent exoponere, ut bene intelligant moralia et ut sciant se et alios regere. Nam et de musica secundum Philosophum in politicis eos scire decet, inquantum deseruit ad bonos mores. Sic ergo morale negocium scire expedit ab iis qui cupiunt principari: ut si omnes alias scientias ignorarent, adhuc studere debent, ut eis moralia vulgaliter et grossa proportionentur: quia per ea princeps sufficientere instruitur, qualiter debeat principari, et quo se et cives inducere debeat ad virtutes.

De Regimine Principum (On the Rule of Princes) companion

A prince read his portion daily. So can you.

Chosen Portion delivers a short daily reading from historic works like this one, free on iOS.

Princes were formed by scheduled daily instruction from this manual; Chosen Portion schedules the same kind of daily formation reading for you.

  • One daily reading in under 3 minutes, in modern readable English
  • Selections from De Regimine Principum and 77 other royal devotional works
  • Finish the 10-day course, then keep a daily formation habit without planning it yourself
Chosen Portion — Daily Prayer (free iOS app)