Hou a man schal knowe hou mochel coveytise is hid in hys herte.
The Hidden Trap of Covetousness
The author challenges the reader to examine their heart for hidden attachments to earthly things, even after having outwardly forsaken the world.
Lift up this image and examine it closely; you'll see that covetousness and love of earthly things occupy a large part of it, even if it seems small. You've left behind the riches and property of this world and are shut away in a cell, but have you truly left behind the love of them?1 I don't think so; it's a smaller feat to give up worldly goods than it is to give up the love of them.2 Perhaps you haven't forsaken covetousness; you've changed from great things into small ones—as from a pound to a penny, and from a silver piece into a halfpenny dish. That's a poor exchange; you're not much of a merchant.3 These examples are childish; nevertheless they point to something more. If you don't believe me, test yourself: whether you have love and delight in having and looking at anything you possess, such as it is, and with that love feed your heart for a time; or whether you have desire and yearning to have something you don't have—with such desire your heart is troubled by unskillful busyness, so that the pure desire of the virtues and of God cannot rest there.4 This is a sign that there is covetousness in this image. And if you want to test it better, see whether anything you have is taken away from you—by force, or by borrowing, or in any other way—and you cannot get it back, and so you're distressed in your heart, and angry and troubled in your heart: both because you lack the thing you want and cannot get it, and also because you're stirred against the one who has it, since he could restore it and will not.5 This is a sign that you love worldly goods, because that's how worldly people act.
The Burden of Attachment
True detachment requires not just the absence of goods, but the absence of desire and sorrow regarding them, as attachment hinders spiritual progress.
When their goods and riches are taken away, they become heavy-hearted, sorrowful, and angry, and they quarrel and fight against those who have them, openly in word and deed—but you do all this privately in your heart, where God sees. And yet you're more at fault than a worldly person, because in outward form you've forsaken the love of all worldly things; but a worldly person hasn't, and therefore he's excused if he contends and pursues by lawful means to get them back.6 But now you say that you need to have your necessities from such things as belong to you, just as a worldly person does. I readily grant that; but you shouldn't love them, nor take any pleasure in looking at them and keeping them, nor feel sorrow or heaviness in losing them or having them taken away—for, as Saint Gregory says, as much sorrow as you have in losing a thing, so much love you had in keeping it.7 Therefore, if your heart were made whole and you had truly felt a desire for spiritual things, and had even a glimpse of the least spiritual thing that is, you would set all love and liking for any earthly thing at nothing—it wouldn't cling to you. For to love and to have more than you reasonably need is a great fault.8 Also, to love the thing you need is a fault, but not as great; but to have and use what you need without loving it is no fault. Truly, many who have the state and the outward appearance of poverty are much blinded on this point and hindered from the love of God.9 I’m not accusing anyone, nor am I criticizing any way of life, because in every walk of life, some people are good and some are not. But one thing I say to every man and woman who has taken the state of poverty willingly, whether religious or secular, or whatever degree they hold: as long as their affection is bound, fastened, and as it were glued with the love of any other earthly thing they have or would like to have, they cannot truly have or feel the pure love and the clear sight of spiritual things.10
The Singleness of Divine Love
God demands an undivided heart, and any lingering love for earthly things diminishes the capacity for the fullness of divine charity and spiritual reward.
As Saint Augustine says to our Lord: "Lord, he loves You only a little who loves anything alongside You." The more love and desire you have for any earthly thing, the less love for God there is in your heart. For though this love of earthly things does not put them out of charity — unless it grows so great that it chokes the love of God and of their fellow Christians — truly it still hinders them and holds you back from the fervor of charity, and also from that special reward they should have in the bliss of heaven for perfect poverty.11 And that is a great loss if they could see it; for whoever could know spiritual reward — how good, how precious, and how worthy it is, lasting forever — would not, for all earthly joy or every earthly thing, even if he could have it without sin, hinder or lose the least reward of the bliss of heaven, which he might have if he would. I speak further than I myself can practice, but I pray you, through the grace of God, do so if you can — or any other who will; for that would be a comfort to me: that though I may not have it in myself as I describe, I might have it in you, or in any other creature who has received from our Lord a greater abundance of His grace than I have. But see then how much covetousness, even in the bare ground, holds a man or a woman back from the spiritual feeling of the love of God — how much more, then, does it hinder and burden worldly men and women who, with all their wits and busyness, study and labor night and day how they might get riches and plenty of worldly goods.12 They can have no other delight except in worldly things, and they will not have any other, for they do not seek it. I say no more about them at this time, for in this writing I am not speaking to them; but this I say: if they could see and would see what they are doing, they would not do so.
Read the original Latin
Lifte up this image and loke wel al aboughte, and thou schalt mowe see covetise and love of erthely thynge occupie a greet partie of this ymage, though it seme litil. Thou haste forsaken the richesse and moche avere of this world, and art sperid in a dongoun; but hast thou forsaken the love of al this? I hope not yit; it is lasse maistrie for to forsake goodis of the world thanne for to forsake the love of hem. Peraventure thou hast not forsake coveitise, thou haste chaunged fro grete thyngis into smale, as from a pound to a peny and from a silveren pece into a dische of an halpeny. This is a symple chaunge; thou art no good marchant. Thise ensamples aren childisch; neverthelees thei bitoken more. Yif thou trowe not me, assaie thisilf yif thou have love and delite in the havynge and in the biholdynge of ony thynge that thou haste, swich as it is, with the whiche love thou feedist thyn herte for a tyme or yif thou have desire and yeerne for to have sum thynge that thou haste not, with siche desire thyn herte is traveiled bi unskilful bisynesse, that the clene desire of vertues and of God mai not reste thereinne. This is a tokene that there is coveitise in this ymage, and yif thou wole assaie betere, loke yif onythinge that thou haste be taken awai from thee, bi maistrie or bi borwynge or bi ony othir wise, and thou mai not geten it agen, and forthi thou art disesid in thyn herte, and angrid and trobelid in thyn herte; bothe thee wanteth that thynge that thou wolde have and mai not gete it, and also agen hym that hath it thou art stired, for he myght restore it agen and wole not.
This is a tokene that thou lovest wordli goodes, for thus doon wordli men.
Whanne that heer good and her richesse is taken from hem, thei aren hevy, sori, and angry, and flite and stryve agens hem that han it, openli with word and bi deede; but thou doost alle thise in thyn herte pryveli, where God seeth. And yit arte thou in more defaute thanne a wordli man, for thou hast forsaken in likenesse the love of alle wordli thynges; but a wordli man hath not so, and therfore he is excusid though he stryve and pursue bi lawful weies for to have hem agen. But now seist thou, that thee bihoveth have thy necessaries of siche thinges as longeth to thee, as wel as a wordli man. I graunte wel therto, but thou schuldest not love hyt, ne noo likynge have in the biholdynge and in the kepynge of it, ne sorwe ne hevynesse fele in the leesynge or in the withdrawing of it; for, as Seynte Gregor seith, as moche sorwe as thou hast in the lesynge of a thynge, so moche love haddest thou in the kepynge. And therfore yif thyn herte were maad hool and thou hadde soothfastli felid a desire of goostli thynges, and hadde thereof a sighte of the leste goostli thynge that is, al the love and likyng of ony ertheli thynge thou schuldest sette it at nought, it schulde not cleve on thee. For to love and for to have more thanne thee nedeth skilfulli, it is a grete defaute. Also for to love that thing that thee nedith is defaute, but not so greet; but for to have and use that thee nedeth withoutin love of it is no defaute. Soothli manye that han the staat and the likenesse of povertee aren moche blyndid in this poynt and hyndred froo the love of God.
But I accuse no man, ne no staat reprove, for in every astaat summe aren goode and sume aren othir. But oo thynge I seie to eche man and woman whiche hath take the staat of poverté wilfulli, whethir he be religious or seculer, or what degree he be inne: As longe as his affeccioun is bounden, festened, and as it were glewid with the love of ony othir ertheli thynge that he hath or ellis wolde have, he mai not have ne feele soothfastili the clene love and the cleer sight of goostli thyngis.
For as Seynt Austyn seith to oure Lord thus: "Lord, he loveth Thee but litil, that loveth ony thynge with Thee." For the more love and coveitise of ony ertheli thinge is in thee, the lasse is the love of God in thyn herte. For though it be soo that this love of ertheli thinge putte hem not oute of charité, but it be so moche that it strangle the love of God and of here even Cristen, sothely it hyndreth hem and letteth thee from the fervour of charité, and also from that special meede that thei schulde have in the blisse of hevene for perfight poverté. And that is a grete losse yif they myght see it; for whooso myght knowe goosteli mede, how good, and how precious, and how worthi it is ay lastynge, he wolde not for al ertheli joie, or al ertheli thynge, though he myght have it withouten synne, lette ne leese the leeste meede of the blisse of hevene, whiche he myghte have yif that he wolde. I speke ferthere thanne y can do, but I pray thee thorugh the grace of God, doo soo yif thou mai, or ony othir whoso wole; for that were a comfort to me, that though y mai not have it in mysilf as I seie, that I myght have it in thee, or in ony othir creature whiche hath receyved of oure Lord more plenté of His grace thanne y. But see now thanne, hou coveitise in the nakid ground letteth a man or a woman so moche from the goosteli felynge of the love of God, how moche more it letteth thanne and encombrith wordli men and women whiche, bi alle here wittes and bisynesse, nyght and dai studie and travaile hou thei myght gete richesse and plenté of wordli goodis. Thei kunne noon othir delite have but in wordli thynges, ne thei wole not, for thei seke it not. I sei no more at this tyme of hem, for in this writynge y speke not to hem; but this I seie, yif thei myght see and wold see what thei doo, thei schulde not doo so.
Notes
- 1 ↩enm 'sperid in a dongoun' = shut/locked in a dungeon (or enclosed cell); kept as 'shut up in a dungeon' for Hilton's stark enclosure image.
- 2 ↩enm 'I hope not yit' is rhetorical doubt ('I don't suppose so yet'), not optimistic wishing; 'lasse maistrie' = a lesser mastery/achievement.
- 3 ↩enm 'symple chaunge' = a poor/unskillful bargain, not merely an uncomplicated one.
- 4 ↩enm 'unskilful bisynesse' is Hilton's term for restless, undisciplined preoccupation that crowds out clean desire of God and the virtues.
- 5 ↩enm 'bi maistrie' here = by force/superior power (not the 'feat/mastery' sense of s3); 'disesid' = uneasy/distressed.
- 6 ↩"in likenesse" rendered as "in outward form": the outward profession or appearance of renouncing worldly love, not necessarily the interior reality.
- 7 ↩Patristic authority: Seynte Gregor (Gregory the Great). The maxim equates grief at loss with the measure of prior attachment.
- 8 ↩"skilfulli" rendered as "reasonably": by sound judgment / what reason judges needful, not mere cleverness.
- 9 ↩"staat and the likenesse of povertee": the formal estate/status of poverty and its outward likeness, not necessarily interior detachment.
- 10 ↩affeccioun: interior attachment/desire of the heart, not mere sentiment; rendered 'affection' in the disordered-attachment sense of the lexeme policy.
- 11 ↩ME "but it be so moche" after a negative is taken as "unless it is so great"; if read as adversative "but," the clause would contrast rather than set a threshold for deadly exclusion from charity.
- 12 ↩"in the nakid ground" likely means covetousness in its bare residue/root (or in those living the bare ground of voluntary poverty), contrasting with active worldly pursuit of wealth; rendered literally as "in the bare ground."
Scala Perfectionis (The Scale of Perfection) companion
A daily portion of stillness
Chosen Portion delivers one short contemplative reading and a guided moment of silence each day — the ascent, one step at a time.
Chosen Portion is the paced doorway into this collection: it portions the dense mystical treatises into one daily reading plus guided silence, exactly as the 14-day plan teaches.
- Daily bite-sized excerpts from the contemplative classics, never a wall of text
- A built-in timed stillness practice that grows from 2 minutes to 10
- Gentle progression through the tradition — the app remembers where you are on the ascent