SR
Eikon Basilike: The Pourtraicture of His Sacred Majestie in His Solitudes and Sufferings/Book 1 · Eikon Basilike: The Pourtraicture of His Sacred Majestie in His Solitudes and Sufferings
Chapter 11EikonBas.1.11

Upon the 19 Propositions first sent to the King, and more afterwards

The Integrity of Conscience

The King asserts that while he desires peace, he cannot sacrifice his conscience or royal honor to satisfy unreasonable political demands.

Although they demand many things, yet if these are all, I'm glad to see at what price they set my own safety and my people's peace—which I cannot think I buy at too high a rate, save only the parting with my conscience and honor. If nothing else will satisfy them, I must choose to be as miserable and inglorious as my enemies can make or wish me to be. I've already offered some of the things proposed to me here, and others are easily granted. As for the rest, I don't believe they should be forced on me at the point of a sword or pressed through the injuries of war, especially when I've already declared that I can't yield to them without violating my conscience. It's strange that there's no way to peace except by making war on my soul. Many things are being required of me, but I see nothing offered to me as a grateful exchange of honor, or any return for those favors I have already granted them—or can still grant them.1 This is the honor they show me: they place me in the position of the giver, which is more princely and divine. They cannot ask more than I can give, provided I may keep for myself the incommunicable jewel of my conscience, and not be forced to part with that whose loss nothing can repair or repay.2 Some things they are pleased to propose seem unreasonable to me; and while I still have any command of my reason, how can they think I can consent to them—when they know those things are incompatible with being either a king or a good Christian? Because I've already yielded so much, some men are confident that I won't refuse anything.3 The love I have for my people's peace certainly influences me a great deal, but the love of truth and inward peace influences me even more. If I granted some of the things they require, I wouldn't so much weaken my outward standing as a king as wound that inward quiet of my conscience—which ought to be, is, and by God's grace always will be, dearer to me than my kingdoms. Some things a king might approve of should still, for honor and policy, sometimes be denied to certain people, so he doesn't seem afraid to refuse anything, and so he doesn't give too much encouragement to unreasonable demands or persistent pressure. But to bind myself to a general and implicit consent to whatever they may desire or propose—for that is one of their Propositions—would be so wide a range of blind obedience as was never expected of any free men, nor is it fit to be required of any man, much less of a King by his own subjects, any of whom he may well surpass as much in wisdom as he does in rank and power. This would be as if Samson had agreed not only to bind his own hands and cut off his hair, but to put out his own eyes, so that the Philistines could mock and abuse him more safely—which they chose to do rather than destroy him outright once he had become so tame an object, and so fit an occasion for their sport and scorn. Certainly, shutting out any power of refusal looks like an arrogance that hardly fits those who claim to make their appeals through humble and loyal petition. By doing so, they sufficiently confess their own inferiority, which obliges them to rest—if not satisfied, then at least quieted—with whatever answer their superior’s will and reason deems appropriate. That superior is acknowledged to have the freedom and power of reason to consent or dissent; otherwise, it would be foolish and absurd to ask for something that another, having no liberty to refuse, also has no power to grant. But if this is my right—belonging to me in reason as a man, and in honor as a sovereign king (as it undoubtedly is)—how can it be anything but extreme injury to confine my reason to a necessity of granting everything they have a mind to ask, when their minds may differ from mine as much in reason and honor as their aims may, and as their qualities do? And those qualities God and the laws have sufficiently distinguished, making me their sovereign and them my subjects—people whose propositions may soon prove violent oppositions if they once succeed in becoming necessary impositions on the royal authority. For no one seeks to limit and confine his king in reason who does not have a secret aim either to share power with him or to usurp him in power and dominion.4 But they want me to trust their moderation and abandon my own judgment, so that I might confirm what some have portrayed me as being: better suited to be their pupil than their prince. Truly, I'm not so confident of my own sufficiency that I won't willingly take the counsel of others. But I'm not so unsure of myself either that I'd brutishly submit to any man's dictates, and at one stroke betray both the sovereignty of reason in my soul and the majesty of my own crown to any of my subjects. Least of all do I have any grounds for trusting them enough to make me fully submit to all the desires of those men who will not acknowledge—or who refuse and neglect to defend—the freedom of their own and others' sitting and voting in Parliament.

The Danger of Innovation

The King critiques the inexperience and radical nature of the parliamentary propositions, viewing them as dangerous innovations rather than true reform.

Besides, everyone who knew them knew this: how young and inexperienced as statesmen most of these proposers are—so that until seven years of experience have shown me how well they can govern themselves, and the power wrested from me, I would be very foolish indeed, and unfaithful to my trust, to put the reins of both reason and government wholly out of my own hands into theirs, whose driving is already too much like Jehu's, and whose eagerness to climb the throne of supremacy looks more like Phaethon than like Phoebus. God avert the omen of that will.5 They would do well to remember that at best they sit in Parliament as my subjects, not my superiors: called to be my counselors, not dictators. Their summons extends to recommending their advice, not to commanding my duty. When I first heard that proposals were to be sent to me, I expected either that some good laws, grown outdated with the passage of time or buried under the corruption of manners, would be sought for restoration of their force and proper enforcement; or that some evil customs outside the law, and personal abuses, would be removed; or that some injuries done by me and others to the common good would be repaired; or that some fair offers would be put before me, in which, once they had weighed the advantages of my crown, they might reasonably lead me to agree to what served my subjects' good without any great diminishing of myself—whom nature, law, reason, and religion bind me first of all to preserve; without which it is impossible to preserve my people according to my place.67 At the very least, I looked for moderate desires to properly reform what was truly wrong in Church and State—reforms that would still preserve the foundation and essentials of government in both, rather than shaking or completely overthrowing them without any regard for existing laws, the wisdom and piety of former Parliaments, the ancient and universal practice of Christian churches, or the rights and privileges of individuals. Furthermore, nothing was offered to replace what was to be destroyed that could simultaneously serve the original purpose of the old institutions, fix their alleged defects, reform their abuses, and satisfy sober and wise men—not with soft, deceptive words pretending zeal and special piety, but with weighty, solid reasons, both divine and human, that might justify the abruptness and necessity of such vast changes. But in all their proposals, I see little of these kinds or aims: nothing about laws that have gone off track and need restoring, rights that have been invaded, justice that needs to be cleared of obstruction, compensations that must be made, or any impartial reformation to be granted—all or any of which reason, religion, true policy, or any other human motives might move me to accept. But regarding the main issues they have raised—wherever there is either great novelty or real difficulty—I see that what used to be treated as political factions and church schisms, and therefore punishable by law, now has the boldness, through popular outcry and outside support, to demand not only toleration for its vanity, novelty, and confusion, but also the abolition of the laws against it and the total uprooting of the government whose rights it intends to seize. So much for the main point: the other propositions are, for the most part, only waste paper in which those are wrapped, so they can be presented a little more handsomely. Nor do I wonder so much at the variety and horrible novelty of some Propositions (there's nothing so monstrous that some imaginations aren't prone to long for it). This throws me not into mere wonder, but into a stunned ecstasy—how such things could ever have come to be proposed in the name of the two Houses of the Parliament of England, among whom, I am very confident, not a quarter of the members of either House, if their judgments were free, individual, and independent, approved or wanted such destructive changes in the government of the Church.8 I'm convinced that by far the greater part of both Houses—if they were free and fully assembled—still has enough learning, reason, religion, and fair moderation to know how to distinguish between the use and abuse of things, the institution and the corruption, government and misgovernment, and the original patterns and the distortions or blots of later copies.910 Surely they couldn't possibly, with so little reason—or none yet produced—so quickly abandon all regard for the laws in force, for antiquity, for the piety of their reforming ancestors, and for the prosperity of earlier times in this Church and State under the current government of the Church. Yet, by a strange twist of fate, these men allow—whether by absence, silence, negligence, or lazy gullibility (believing that everything is good if it's gilded with shows of zeal and reformation)—their private dissent in judgment to be swept into the common sewer or stream of the present fashion and mood; and that current has its chief origin and support in those popular clamors and tumults that served to give life and strength to the endless activity of the men who worked with all diligence and cunning to turn the present disorders to the advantage of their innovating schemes.11 These armies of propositions, which in my judgment have so little reason, justice, or religion on their side—having risen instead from tumult and faction—cannot stand alone; they must always be backed and reinforced by armies of soldiers. Though these soldiers might prevail against my person, those propositions will never overcome me any further than I see cause, for I don't look so much at their number and power as I weigh their reason and justice. Had the two Houses first sued out their livery, and once truly redeemed themselves from the wardship of the tumults (which can be nothing other than the hounds that follow the cry and halloo of those men who hunt after factions and private designs, to the ruin of Church and State).12 If my judgment told me that the proposals sent to me were the result of a majority vote from those exercising their freedom as fully as they have the right to sit in Parliament, I would then doubt my own judgment for not promptly and fully agreeing with every one of them. I have enough charity to believe there are wise men among them, and enough humility to recognize that, just as I may fall short in some areas, it's right for me to seek their advice—which is the very reason I called them to Parliament. But even so, I cannot grant their wisdom such completeness and infallibility as to leave me out; since none of them has the part I must play, the trust I must discharge, or the estate and honor I must preserve, as I do—without whose reason working together with theirs (as the sun's influence is necessary in all nature's productions) they cannot conceive or bring forth any single complete and authoritative act of public wisdom that makes the laws.13 But the unreasonableness of some of those proposals is just as obvious to me as the fact that they aren't the shared and free desires of the majority of those who have the right to sit and vote in Parliament. Many of them strongly smack of that old leaven of innovation, masked under the name of Reformation—which, in the days of my two last famous predecessors, rose against and at times threatened both prince and Parliaments. But I'm sure it never used to go so far as to infect the whole body of the nobility and gentry of this kingdom, however much it spread among the common people. Nor was it likely to so suddenly taint the majority of both Houses that they would unanimously desire and carry out such enormous and dangerous innovations in church and state, contrary to their former education, practice, and judgment.1415 It's not that I'm unaware of how the election of many Members was driven by intense factionalism in the counties—some of them thirsting for nothing more than a passionate revenge for whatever grievances they held against me, my Court, or the clergy.16 But reason tells me to attribute these sudden, sweeping desires for change to the few who armed themselves with many-headed, many-handed tumults. Reason, honor, and the safety of both Church and State command me just as strongly to chew such morsels carefully before I swallow them. If the strictness of my conscience won't let me swallow down such camels as others do—camels of sacrilege and injustice toward both God and man—they have no more reason to quarrel with me than this: that my throat isn't as wide as theirs.17 Yet by God's help I am resolved that nothing of passion or peevishness, or an itch to contradict, or vanity to show off my power of refusal, will bias my judgment so as to make me gratify my will by denying anything that my reason and conscience do not command me to refuse.18 On the other hand, I won't agree to anything more than what reason, justice, honor, and religion persuade me to—for the sake of God's glory, the Church's good, my people's welfare, and my own peace. I'll work to satisfy my Parliament and my people; but I'll never, out of fear or flattery, gratify any faction, however powerful it may be—for that would be to nourish the disease and oppress the body.

A Prayer for Divine Guidance

The King turns to God in prayer, seeking wisdom to discern truth and the strength to remain steadfast in his duty despite external pressures.

Even though the loyalty and prudence of many are so intimidated that they won't give me the free and faithful counsel they're able and willing to offer—and that I may need—still, no one can stop me from seeking the counsel of that mighty Counsellor, who can both suggest what is best and incline my heart steadfastly to follow it. O first and eternal Reason, whose wisdom is fortified with omnipotence: furnish your servant first with clear discoveries of Truth, Reason, and Justice in my understanding; then so confirm my will and resolve to hold to them that no terrors, injuries, or oppressions from my enemies may ever force me against those rules which you, through them, have planted in my conscience. You never made me a king so that I would be less than a man, and not dare to say yes or no as I see cause—a freedom that is not denied even to the humblest creature who has the use of reason and liberty of speech.19 Should what is praiseworthy honesty and steadfastness in others be blameworthy in me? You see, Lord, the bias and injustice with which they deny me, their King, the freedom You have given to everyone—a freedom they stubbornly claim for themselves—even as they guard their own privileges against the slightest infringement. To You I make my supplication, who can guide us by an unerring rule through the tangled labyrinths of our own thoughts and other men's proposals—which I have some reason to suspect are purposely cast as snares, so that by my granting or denying them I might be more entangled in those difficulties with which they lie in wait to afflict me. O Lord, make your way plain before me. Don't let my own sinful passions cloud or divert your sacred suggestions. Let your glory be my goal, your Word my rule, and then your will be done. I can't please everyone, and I don't care to please some people; if I can be happy enough to please You, I don't need to fear anyone I displease. You who turn the world's wisdom into foolishness and trap those who are wise in their own eyes with their own schemes: make me wise through your Truth, for your honor, the common good of my kingdom, and the salvation of my soul—and I won't worry much about the world's opinion or how it belittles me. The less wisdom they're willing to credit Me with, the more they'll be convinced of your Wisdom directing Me—while I refuse nothing that ought to be granted out of stubbornness or whim, and grant nothing that ought to be refused out of any fear of people or flattery from them. Don't let me become guilty or unfortunate by willingly or thoughtlessly advancing anyone's designs that harm the public good, while I confirm them with my consent. Nor let me become any occasion to hinder or cheat the public of what is best through any sullen or willfully stubborn dissent. Make me so humbly charitable that I will follow their advice when it appears to be for the public good—though of their affection for me I still have only scant evidence to assure me.20 You can just as easily bless honest errors as you can condemn fraudulent advice. Lord, since we must give an account for every evil and idle word in private at your tribunal, make me careful of those solemn declarations of mine that are likely to have the greatest influence on the public, whether for harm or for good. The less carefully others consider what they ask, make me all the more careful about what I answer. Though the pressures on me and my people are heavy, and peace would be very welcome, Lord, never let me avoid the one or purchase the other at the slightest expense or waste of my conscience—of which you alone, O Lord, are rightfully more master than I am.

Read the original Latin

Although there be many things, they demand, yet if these be all, I am glad to see at what price they set my own safety, and my peoples peace; which I cannot think I buy at too dear a rate, save only the parting with my Conscience and Honor. If nothing else will satisfie, I must chuse rather to be as miserable and inglorious, as My enemies can make or wish me.

Some things here propounded to me have been offered by me; others are easily granted; The rest (I think) ought not to be obtruded upon me, with the point of the sword; nor urged with the injuries of a Warr; when I have already declared that I cannot yeeld to them, without violating my Conscience: 'tis strange, there can be no method of peace, but by making war upon my soul.

Here are many things required of me, but I see nothing offer'd to me, by the way of gratefull Exchange of Honour; or any requitall or those favours, I have, or can yet grant them.

This Honour they do me, to put Me on the giving part, which is more princely and divine. They cannot ask more then I can give, may I but reserve to my Self the incommunicable Jewell of my Conscience; and not be forced to part with that, whose loss nothing can repair or requite.

Some things (which they are pleased to propound) seem unreasonable to Me; and while I have any mastery of my Reason, how can they think I can consent to them; who know they are such as are inconsistent with being either a King, or a good Christian? My yeilding so much (as I have already) makes some men confident I will deny nothing.

The love I have of my peoples peace, hath (indeed) great influence upon Me; but the love of truth and inward peace hath more.

Should I grant some things they require, I should not so much weaken my outward state of a King, as wound that inward quiet of my Conscience; which ought to be, is, and ever shall be (by Gods Grace) dearer to Me then my Kingdoms.

Some things which a King might approve, yet in Honour and Policy are at some time to be denied, to some men, lest he should seem not to dare to deny any thing; and give too much incouragement to unreasonable demands or importunities.

But to bind my Self to a generall and implicite consent to what-ever they shall desire or propound, (for such is one of their Propositions) were such a latitude of blind obedience, as never was expected from any Free-men, nor fit to be required of any man, much less of a King by his own Subjects; any of whom he may possibly exceed as much in wisdom, as he doth in place and power.

This were, as if Samson should have consented, not only to bind his own hands, and cut off his hair, but to put out his own eys, that the Philistins might with the more safety mock and abuse him; which they chose rather to do, then quite destroy him, when he was become so tame an object, and fit occasion for their sport and scorn.

Certainly, to exclude all power of denyall, seems an arrogancy least of all becoming those who pretend to make their Addresses in an humble and loyall way of petitioning; who by that, sufficiently confess their own inferiority, which obligeth them to rest, if not satisfied, yet quieted, with such an Answer as the Will and Reason of their Superiour thinks fit to give; who is acknowledged to have a freedom and power of Reason, to Consent or Dissent, else it were very foolish and absurd to ask, what another having not liberty to deny, neither hath power to grant.

But if this be my Right belonging to Me, in Reason as a Man, and in Honour as a Soveraign King (as undoubtedly it doth) how can it be other then extreme injury to confine my Reason to a necessity of granting all they have a mind to ask, whose minds may be as differing from mine, both in reason and honour, as their aims may be, and their qualities are? which last God and the Laws have sufficiently distinguisht, making me their Soveraign, and them my Subjects: whose Propositions may soon prove violent oppositions, if once they gain to be necessary impositions upon the Regall Authority; Since no man seeks to limit and confine his King in Reason, who hath not a secret aim to share with him, or usurp upon him in Power and Dominion.

But they would have me trust to their moderation, and abandon mine own discretion; that so I might verifie what representations some have made of me to the world, that I am fitter to be their Pupil then their Prince. Truly, I am not so confident of my own sufficiency, as not willingly to admit the Counsel of others: But yet I am not so diffident of my self, as brutishly to submit to any mans dictates, and at once to betray the Soveraignty of Reason in my soul, and the Majesty of my own Crown to any of my Subjects.

Least of all have I any ground of credulity, to induce me fully to submit to all the desires of those men, who will not admit, or do refuse, and neglect to vindicate the freedom of their own and others Sitting and Voting in Parliament.

Besides, all men that knew them, knew this, how young States-men the most part of these propounders are; so that till experience of one seven years have shewed me how well they can govern themselves, and so much power as is wrested from me, I should be very foolish indeed, and unfaithful in my Trust, to put the reins of both Reason and Government wholly out of my Own, into their hands, whose driving is already too much like Jehues; and whose forwardnesse to ascend the throne of Supremacie pretends more of Phaeton then of Phebus; God divert the Omen of his will.

They may remember that at best they sit in Parliament, as my Subjects, not my Superiours: called to be My Counsellours, not Dictatours: Their Summons extends to recommend their Advice, not to command my Dutie.

When I first heard of Propositions to be sent me, I expected either some good Laws which had been antiquated by the course of time, or overlaid by the corruption of manners, had been desired to a restauration of their vigour and due execution; or some evil Customs preterlegall, and abuses personall had been to be removed: or some injuries done by my Self, and others, to the Common-weal, were to be repaired: or some equable offertures were to be tendred to Me, wherein the advantages of my Crown being considered by them, might fairly induce me to condescend to what tended to my Subjects good, without any great diminution of my Self, whom Nature, Law, Reason and Religion binde Me (in the first place) to preserve; without which 'tis impossible to preserve my people according to my place.

Or (at least) I looked for such moderate desires of due Reformation of what was (indeed) amisse in Church and State, as might still preserve the foundation and essentials of Government in both; not shake and quite overthrow either of them, without any regard to the Laws in force, the wisdom and piety of former Parliaments, the ancient, and universall practice of Christian Churches; the Rights and Priviledges of particular men: Nor yet any thing offered in lieu, or in the room of what must be destroyed, which might at once reach the good end of the others Institution, and also supply its pretended defects, reform its abuses, and satisfie sober and wise men, not with soft and specious words, pretending zeal, and special piety, but with pregnant and solid Reasons, both divine and humane, which might justifie the abruptnesse and necessity of such vast Alterations.

But in all their Propositions I can observe little of these kindes, or to these ends: Nothing of any Laws dis-jointed, which are to be restored; of any right invaded; of any justice to be unobstructed; of any compensations to be made; of any impartiall Reformation to be granted: to all or any of which Reason, Religion, true Policy, or any other humane motives might induce Me.

But as to the main matters propounded by them at any time, in which is either great novelty or difficulty, I perceive, that what were formerly look'd upon as Factions in the State, and Schisms in the Church, and so punishable by the Laws, have now the confidence, by vulgar clamours, and assistance (chiefly) to demand not onely Tolerations of themselves, in their vanity, novelty, and confusion; but also Abolition of the Laws against them, and a totall extirpation of that Government, whose Rights they have a mind to invade.

This as to the main: Other Propositions are (for the most part) but as waste paper in which those are wrapped up, to present them somewhat more handsomly.

Nor do I so much wonder at the variety, and horrible noveltie of some Propositions, (there being nothing so monstrous, which some fancies are not prone to long for).

This casts me into, not an admiration, but an extasie, how such things should have the fortune to be propounded in the name of the two Houses of the Parliament of England, among whom, I am very confident, there was not a fourth part of the Members of either House, whose Judgements free, single and apart did approve or desire such destructive changes in the Government of the Church.

I am perswaded there remains in far the Major part of both Houses (if free and full) so much Learning, Reason, Religion, and just Moderation, as to know how to sever between the use and the abuse of things, the institution and the corruption, the Government and the mis-government, the Primitive Patterns and the aberrations or blottings of after-Copies.

Sure they could not at all, upon so little, or no Reason (as yet produced to the contrary) so soon renounce all regard to the Laws in force, to antiquity, to the piety of their Reforming progenitors, to the prosperity of former times in this Church and State, under the present Government of the Church.

Yet, by a strange fatality, these men suffer, either by their absence, or silence, or negligence, or supine credulity (beleeving that all is good, which is guilded with shewes of Zeal and Reformation) their private dissenting in Judgement to be drawn into the common sewer or streame of the present vogue and humour; which hath its chief rise and abetment from those popular clamors and tumults: which served to give life and strength to the infinite activity of those men, who studied with all diligence, and policy, to improve to their innovating designes, the present distractions.

Such Armies of Propositions having so little, in my judgment, of Reason, Justice, and Religion on their side, as they had Tumult and Faction for their rise, must not go alone, but ever be backt and seconded, with Armies of Souldiers; Though the second should prevaile against my Person, yet that first shall never overcome me further then I see cause; for, I look not at their number and power, so much as I weigh their Reason and Justice.

Had the two Houses first sued out their Livery, and once effectually redeemed themselves from the Wardship of the Tumults, (which can be no other then the Hounds that attend the cry and hollow of those men, who hunt after factions and private Designes, to the ruine of Church and State.)

Did my Judgement tell Me, that the propositions sent to Me were the Results of the major part of their Votes, who exercise their freedom, as well as they have a right to sit in Parliament: I should then suspect my Own judgment, for not speedily and fully concurring with every one of them.

For, I have charity enough to think there are wise men among them: and humility to think, that, as in some things I may want, so 'tis fit I should use their advice, which is the end for which I called them to a Parliament. But yet I cannot allow their wisdom such a compleatness and inerrability as to exclude my Self; since none of them hath that part to act, that Trust to discharge, nor that Estate and Honour to preserve, as my Self; without whose Reason concurrent with theirs (as the Suns influence is necessary in all Natures, productions) they cannot beget, or bring forth any one compleat and authoritative Act of publick wisdom, which makes the Laws.

But the unreasonableness of some Propositions is not more evident to me then this is, That they are not the joynt and free desires of those in their Major number, who are of right to Sit and Vote in Parliament.

For, many of them favour very strong of that old leaven of Innovations, masked under the name of Reformation; (which in my Two last famous Predecessours days heaved, at, and sometime threatned both Prince and Parliaments:) But, I am sure, was never wont so far to infect the whole masse of the Nobility and Gentry of this Kingdom; how-ever it dispersed among the Vulgar: Nor was it likely so suddenly to taint the Major part of both Houses, as that they should unanimously desire, and effect so enormous and dangerous innovations in Church and State, contrary to their former education, practice, and judgment.

Not that I am ignorant, how the choice of many Members was carried by much Faction in the Countries; some thirsting after nothing more then a passionate revenge of what-ever displeasure they had conceived against Me, my Court, or the Clergy.

But all Reason bids me impute these sudden and vast desires of change to those few, who armed themselves with the many-headed, and many-handed Tumults.

No less doth Reason, Honour, and Safety both of Church and State command me to chew such morsels before I let them down; If the straitness of my Conscience will not give me leave to swallow down such Camels, as others do, of Sacriledge, and injustice both to God and man, they have no more cause to quarrell with me, then for this, that my throat is not so wide as theirs. Yet, by Gods help, I am resolved, That nothing of passion or peevishnesse, or list to contradict, or vanity to shew my negative power, shall have any byas upon my judgment, to make me gratifie my will, by denying any thing which my Reason and Conscience commands me not.

Nor on the other side, will I consent to more then Reason, Justice, Honor and Religion perswade me to be, for Gods glory, the Churches good, my Peoples welfare, and my own peace.

I will study to satisfie my Parliament, and my People; but I will never for fear, or flatterie gratifie any Faction, how potent soever; for this were to nourish the disease, and oppresse the body.

Although many mens loyalty and prudence are terrified from giving me, that free and faithfull counsel, which they are able and willing to impart, and I may want; yet none can hinder me from craving of the councell of that mighty Counsellor who can both suggest what is best, and incline my heart stedfastly to follow it.

O thou first and eternal Reason; whose wisdom is fortified with omnipotencie, furnish thy servant, first with clear discoveries of Truth, Reason and Justice in My understanding; then so confirm my will and resolution to adhere to them, that no terrors, injuries or oppressions of mine enemies may ever inforce me against those rules, which thou by them hast planted in My Conscience.

Thou never madest me a King, that I should be less then a Man; and not dare to say, Yea, or Nay, as I see cause; which freedom is not denied to the meanest creature that hath the use of Reason, and liberty of speech.

Shall that be blameable in me, which is commendable veracity and constancy in others?

Thou seest, O Lord, with what partiallity, and injustice, they deny that freedom to me their KING, which Thou hast given to all men; and which Themselves pertinaciously challenge to themselves, while they are so tender of the least breach of their priviledges.

To thee I make my supplication, who canst guide us by an unerring rule, through the perplexed Labyrinths of our own thoughts, and other mens Proposals; which I have some cause to suspect, are purposely cast as snares, that by My granting or denying them, I might be more entangled in those difficulties, wherewith they lie in wait to afflict me.

O Lord, make thy way plain before Me.

Let not my own sinful passions cloud, or divert thy sacred suggestions.

Let thy Glory be my end, thy Word my rule, and then thy will be done.

I cannot please all, I care not to please some men; if I may be happie to please thee, I need not fear whom I displease.

Thou that makest the wisdome of the world foolishnesse, and takest in their own devices, such as are wise in their own conceits, make Me wise by thy Truth, for thy honor, my Kingdoms generall good, and my own souls salvation, and I shall not much regard the worlds opinion or diminution of Me.

The lesse of wisdome they are willing to impute to Me, the more they shall be convinced of thy Wisdom directing Me, while I deny nothing fit to be granted, out of crosnesse or humour; nor grant any thing which is to be denied, out of any fear or flatterie of men.

Suffer me not to be guiltie or unhappie, by willing or inconsiderate advancing any mens designes, which are injurious to the publique good, while I confirm them by My consent.

Nor let Me be any occasion to hinder or defraud the Publick of what is best, by any morose or perverse dissentings.

Make Me so humbly charitable, as to follow their advice, when it appears to be for the publick good; of whose affections to me, I have yet but few evidencies to assure Me.

Thou canst as well blesse honest errours, as blast fraudulent counsels.

Since we must give an account of every evill and idle word in private, at thy Tribunall; Lord make me carefull of those solemne Declarations of mine which are like to have the greatest influence upon the Publique, either for woe, or weale.

The lesse others consider what they aske, make me the more solicitous what I answer.

Though Mine own, and My Peoples pressures are grievous, and peace would be very pleasing; yet Lord, never suffer Me to avoid the one, or purchase the other, with the least expense or wast of my Conscience; whereof thou, O Lord, onely art deservedly more Master then my self.

Scripture echoes

  1. Isa.9.6For the increase of his government and for peace there will be no end, upon the throne of David and over his kingdom, to establish it and to uphold it with justice and with righteousness from this time forth and forevermore. The zeal of the LORD of hosts will do this.
  2. Ps.5.8But I, in the abundance of your steadfast love, will enter your house; I will bow down toward your holy temple in the fear of you.
  3. Gal.1.10For am I now seeking the approval of people, or of God? Or am I still trying to please people? If I were still pleasing people, I would not be a servant of Christ.

Notes

  1. 1Source reads “any requitall or those favours.” The natural sense is “requital of those favors” (the favors already given or still to be given); “or” is treated as period phrasing/compositor noise rather than an alternative offering of the favors themselves.
  2. 2Source 'then' is the Early Modern spelling of 'than' in the comparative 'more than I can give'.
  3. 3Source spelling 'yeilding' normalized to modern 'yielding' / 'having yielded'.
  4. 4Source 'which last' points back to 'qualities' in s1 (the final term of the comparison). Rendered as 'those qualities' for clarity.
  5. 5"Jehu" (2 Kings 9) drives furiously; "Phaethon" vs. "Phoebus" contrasts reckless usurping of the chariot of rule with the sun-god's proper mastery. Early modern "pretends more of" means "bears more the character of / resembles," not modern "pretends to be."
  6. 6Source 'condescend' is period English for consenting/agreeing (not modern pejorative condescension); rendered 'agree' to avoid misreading.
  7. 7'preterlegall' rendered as 'outside the law' (extralegal/beyond legal warrant).
  8. 8Early modern 'admiration' here means wonder/astonishment, not praise; 'extasie' means being beside oneself with amazement. Rendered as wonder vs. stunned ecstasy to keep the contrast of degree.
  9. 9Parliamentary idiom: free of coercion or packing, and full in attendance/membership (not a reduced or purged house).
  10. 10Contrast of the early/original models of church order with later corrupted reproductions; 'blottings' are stains or smearings on those copies.
  11. 11Period 'suffer' here means 'allow/permit,' not undergo pain; rendered as 'allow.' 'Fatality' means adverse fate/destiny, not death. 'Improve to' means exploit or turn to account for; 'policy' means calculated craft/cunning; 'distractions' means civil disorders.
  12. 12"Sued out their livery" and "wardship" are feudal legal figures: an heir sued out livery to claim formal possession of lands and exit a guardian's control. Charles applies the image to Parliament freeing itself from mob control.
  13. 13Source 'inerrability' rendered as 'infallibility' (freedom from error); 'compleatness' modernized to 'completeness'. 'want' in s1 means lack/deficiency, not desire.
  14. 14Early modern 'favour of' / 'savour of' means to have the distinctive taste or taint of something; rendered as 'smack of' for natural contemporary force without softening the charge.
  15. 15Source 'heaved, at' is taken as the idiom 'heaved at' (strained/pushed against); rendered as 'rose against' for clear modern sense.
  16. 16Early Modern 'Countries' is rendered as 'counties' (regional constituencies), the usual sense when discussing parliamentary elections; 'then' is the period spelling of 'than'.
  17. 17"Camels" alludes to the Gospel rebuke of those who "strain out a gnat and swallow a camel" (cf. Matt. 23:24); Charles keeps the image as a charge of swallowing gross sacrilege and injustice.
  18. 18"Negative power" is rendered as "power of refusal" (the royal veto / power to deny), not as moral negativity.
  19. 19Source 'less then a Man' is the early-modern spelling of 'than'; rendered as comparative 'than', not temporal 'then'.
  20. 20Source “evidencies” is an early-modern form of “evidences/proofs”; rendered as “evidence.” “Affections” here means goodwill or loyalty, not romantic feeling.

Eikon Basilike: The Pourtraicture of His Sacred Majestie in His Solitudes and Sufferings companion

A prayer for every moment, already on your phone

Chosen Portion puts a curated historic prayer in front of you each day — so the words are there before the moment arrives.

Chosen Portion is the digital descendant of the carried prayer book: the short daily prayers this collection preserves, delivered one a day to your pocket.

  • One short, memorable prayer delivered daily — build your repertoire a card at a time
  • Prayers matched to real situations: fear, gratitude, decisions, grief, sleep
  • Save favourites into your personal pocket collection you can open anywhere
Chosen Portion — Daily Prayer (free iOS app)