SR
Loci Communes Rerum Theologicarum/Book 1 · Loci communes rerum theologicarum seu hypotyposes theologicae (1521)
Chapter 20LocC.1.20

De poenitentia

De poenitentia

Repentance is not a sign; it is nothing obscure. For repentance is the mortification of our old self and the renewal of the spirit; it is the Sacrament or sign of nothing other than baptism. And here, it is rightly called the Sacrament of Penance. Indeed, repentance is our mortification, so that we may be renewed in life. What is baptism, but a sign of the meaning it conveys? This is the essence of the sacrament. Listen to how the argument is overturned and the goat is revealed when the baptism of infants is called into question. Indeed, those who do not receive heavenly grace through baptism are in a dire situation. I urge you, leaders, to command this matter regarding the baptism of infants with great care. What good is it to you not to see what will happen, where the salvation of infants will be questioned? — they denied the baptism. Common places. As I said before, it is signified. And Paul testifies in Romans. . For we who were baptized into Christ Jesus were baptized into his death. And in Titus 3, it is called the washing of regeneration. The Christian life is nothing other than this very repentance, which is our regeneration. Mortification comes through the law, as has been said above. For this terrifies and kills the conscience. Life comes through the Gospel, or through absolution. For the gospel is nothing other than the very act of absolution. What we call mortification, the Scholastics wanted to call contrition, which I allow if they don't speak about pain through free will, but rather through human powers pretending to speak. You can't hate sin by nature. But it is God's work to confuse and terrify our conscience. Hierem. They did not know how to be ashamed. And XVII: The sin of Judah is written with a iron stylus on a diamond point, engraved on the width of their hearts. And when you showed me, I struck my thigh. And Christ spoke about the Pharisees. Now you, Pharisees, clean the outside of the cup and dish, but inside you are full of greed and wickedness. But these things mentioned above are discussed more broadly when we talk about the comparison of the law and the gospel. For true repentance is nothing other than the mortification of the flesh. In the meantime, I warn you to avoid scholastic figments about attrition and pain as if they were a plague, and to be cautious of using free will in a way that pretends to be genuine. Your heart will easily judge whether you truly grieve or are just pretending to feel sorrow. But don’t trust in your sorrow, as if that alone would lead to the forgiveness of your sin; rather, I’ll explain later, it’s through absolution and the word of God. Perhaps you'll allow that baptism is a sign of repentance, which is a sign of both mortification and new life, if you persevere. But what sign is there for those who have fallen, that shows they are received back into grace? For they have only referred the term and Sacrament of penance to those who have fallen. I respond: Just as the knowledge of sin is the beginning of sin, so is the fear of divine judgment. We have not lost the grace of the Gospel, nor the sacrament of baptism. It is certain that the Gospel does not just once, but again and again forgives sin. Therefore, the baptism pertains no less to the second forgiveness than to the first. For baptism is the gospel, which means the forgiveness of sins and a pledge. Matthew. Eighteen, s. Peter asks, how often should he forgive his brothers? Where the Lord responds: "Seventy times seven times you must forgive." II, s. : But if anyone sins, we have an advocate with the Father, Jesus Christ, and he is the propitiation for our sins, etc. And if anyone has sinned, we have an advocate with the Father, Jesus Christ, and he is the atonement for our sins. Paul commands that the incestuous person be received back. This is also found in Chrysostom and is cited from Clement of Alexandria, regarding an incident where John the Apostle brought a certain young deserter back to repentance. And because repentance is divided into contrition, confession, and satisfaction, we will briefly share our thoughts on these. Regarding contrition, it has been sufficiently stated that if it is genuine, it is the mortification of our old self, which Scripture calls a pain greater than any human reason can estimate. It is far from the case that we can be crushed or mortified without the work of the Holy Spirit and our free will. Confession is another thing, by which we acknowledge our sin before God and condemn ourselves. This confession is nothing other than that very mortification and true contrition I was just speaking about. And the Scriptures often mention this. If we confess our sins, He is faithful and just to forgive us our sins. And David said, L. For I acknowledge my iniquity, and my sin is always before me. Against you alone have I sinned and done evil in your sight, so that you may be justified in your words and prevail when you are judged. Item Ps. I said, 'I will confess my injustice to the Lord,' and you forgave the guilt of my sin. Without this confession, sin cannot be forgiven. Again, this confession cannot be forgiven, namely, the one we make to Eusebius. It's essential. The church is a place of refuge for the weary and a source of strength for the weak. We accuse ourselves and condemn ourselves before God, giving glory to truth and justice. There is another kind of confession, in which we do not only accuse ourselves privately before God, but also publicly before others. This is how it used to be in the church: Anyone accused of a crime was first privately confronted by a brother, and then publicly charged before the church. And there, the offense was forgiven for the one who repented. He was cast out of the church, who did not listen to the church. You have the form of this confession, Matthew. XVIH, where the use of the keys is revealed. Now, there is no example of it in the Church, since there would be no better reason for correcting faults. But that confession succeeded, in which matters are dealt with privately and separately with individual priests. The difference between that ancient form of confession and our current practice is that the former dealt only with public and manifest sins, while our practice also addresses private matters. The very ancient practice was to accuse public crimes before the entire church and to be absolved by the votes of the whole church. This practice has long been abolished, and now only one designated elder from among the presbyters is allowed to hear private accusations, even though they concern public crimes; he would impose penalties for scandalous offenses at the discretion of the church, specifically for public crimes. They were not admitted to the assembly unless they had already served their public penance. His example still remains in our public penances, as murderers are punished in the church. Anyone who describes this form of penance is the author of the Tripartite History, a Greek writer, who claims that it still endures in the Western churches, and he often mentions it, as Cyprian does. When someone speaks about the confession of public sins, they indicate that it should be made before a priest rather than before the entire church. You may require, if you wish, a sermon about those who have fallen. I will present the words of the ancient history: 'It has been seen by the ancient pontiffs that...' The cited passage is almost literally found there in IX. Digitized by Google, just like in a theater, where the sins of the ecclesiastical people are revealed under testimony, and for this reason they designated a priest of good conduct, a wise man who keeps secrets, to whom those who had sinned came, confessing their own sins. He indicated the penance according to each person's fault. This has also been diligently preserved in the Western churches, especially in Rome, where there is a specific place for penitents, where those who mourn stand; moreover, where the sacred celebration has been completed, those who do not receive Communion, with sighs and lamentations, prostrate themselves on the ground. The bishop rushes to them, and he himself falls to the ground with tears and spiritual lamentation, while the entire congregation weeps. Then the bishop rises first of all and lifts up those who are lying on the ground. Then he forgives all those who are penitent through prayer. Meanwhile, they afflict themselves with various hardships according to the bishop's directive. They await the time prescribed by the bishop for the assembly. At the time when the debt has been fully paid, the whole church participates in the gathering. The Roman Pontiffs have observed this up to our own times. But in Constantinople, a priest was in charge of penitents for a time, while a certain woman of high nobility, after her confession, was performing penance in the church, having slept with a deacon several times. When this became publicly known, a crowd rose up against the priests, claiming that they had violated the church. There, Bishop Nectarius removed a deacon from his office and abolished the old practice of public penance, allowing no designated priest for the penitents, so that each person could participate in the Lord's table according to their own conscience's judgment, whenever they were free to do so. This is almost word for word from the Tripartite History. From this, you can gather that there were once two forms of public penance: one from the early Church, where the matter was handled before the entire congregation, and the other involving those who were either expelled from the communion of the faithful because they refused to repent, or those who were absolved after they did repent. You have an example of this in I. And II. Regarding incest; the other, where there is a public penalty, confession is not permitted. What good is it to you? Today, an example of this is found in the repentance of murderers. Punishments are not due by divine law, but have arisen from human traditions, as I will explain later. And regarding this kind of penance, the ancient canons speak of it, which the foolish teachers of human law ineptly twist to apply to private matters.

Read the original Latin

Poenitentiam non esse signum, nihil obscurum est.

Est enim poenitentia vetustatis nostrae mortificatio et renovatio spiritus, sacramentum ejus vel signum non aliud, nisi baptismus est.

Atque hic omnium rectissime vocetur sacramentum poenitentiae.

Siquidem poenitentia mortificatio nostri est, in vitam seu ut renovemur.

Id quod baptismo, erdichtete Bedeutung. “ mas Hhadinus, C.

I,: audite, quomodo evertat argumentum et revellat hircus, quum infantium "baptismum in dubium vocat.

Nempe quibus non contingat per baptismum coelestis gratia.

— Vos Principes admoneo, ut jubeatis hunc mire sententiae suae de parvulorum baptismo rationem.

Quid enim futurum sit non videtis, ubi de infantium salute dubitabitur?

— dertaufe leugneten.

Loci commune».

ut ante dixi, significatur.

Et testatur Paulus Rom. . VI,: Qui baptizali sumus in Christum Jesum, in mortem ejus baptizati sumus etc.

Et ad Titum III, nuncupatur lavacrum regenerationis.

Neque aliud est vita Christiana, nisi haec ipsa poenitentia, hoc est, regeneratio nostri.

Mortificatio fit per legem, ut supra dictum est. | Nam haec conscientiam terret et occidit.

Vivificatio fit per evangelium seu per absolutionem.

Non enim aliud est evangelium, nisi ipsa absolutio.

Quod mortificationem nos vocamus, Scholastici contritionem voluerunt dici, id quod ita permitto, si non de dolore per liberum arbitrium, per vires humanas simulato loquantur.

Non potest enim odisse peccatum natura.

Sed divinum opus est conscientiam nostram confundere et pavefacere.

Hierem.

VI,: Erubescere nescierunt.

Et XVII,: Peccatum Juda scriptum est stilo ferreo in ungue adamantino, exaratum super latitudinem cordis eorum.

Et XXXI,: Postquam ostendisti mihi, percussi femur meum.

Et Christus de Pharisaeis Luc.

XI,: Nunc vos, Pharisaei, quod deforis est calicis et calini, mundatis, quod autem intus est vestrum, plenum est rapina et iniquitate.

Sed haec supra latius, cum de collatione legis et evangelii dissereremus.

Non aliud enim poenitentia est nisi mortificatio ).

Interim moneo, ut tanquam pestem caveas scholastica figmenta de attritionibus et de dolore per liberum arbitrium simulato.

Facile autem judicabit cor tuum, vere doleas an simules dolorem.

Sed nec dolore tuo fidas, quasi ideo condonetur peccatum quod doleat, sed potius, ut postea dicam, absolutione et verbo Dei.

Fortassis autem permittes poenitentiae, hoc est, mortificationis et vivificationis signum baptismum esse, si perseveres.

Quod autem lapsis signum est, quod recipi eos in gratiam testetur?

Nam ad lapsos tantum retulerunt poenitentiae vocabulum et sacramentum.

Respondeo: Sicut evan principium peccati cognitio et judicii divini metus.

Digitized by Google gelium non amisimus alicubi lapsi, ita nec evangelii atpqayidct, baptismum.

Certum est autem evangelium non semel tantum, sed iterum atque iterum remittere peccatum.

Quare non minus ad secundam condonationem, quam ad primam baptismus pertinet.

Est enim baptismus evangelii, id est, remissionis peccatorum arabo et pignus.

Matth.

XVIII, s.

Petrus interrogat, quoties debeat remittere fratribus?

ubi Dominus respondet: Septuagies septies condonandum esse.

II, s. : Sed et si quis peccaverit, advocatum habemus apud patrem, Jesum Christum et ipse est propitiatio pro peccatis nostris etc.

et II.

Paulus recipi jubet incestum.

Est et apud Chrysostomum et citatur ex Clemente Alexandrino Johannis apostoli factum, qui juven&n quendam desertorem ad poenitentiam revocavit ).

Et quia poenitentiam partiti sunt in contritionem, confessionem et satisfactionem, paucis referemus de his nostram sententiam.

De contritione satis dictum est; quae, si vera est, mortificatio vetustatis nostrae est, quam ita vocat Scriptura, dolor omnino major, quam quem possit vel aestimare hominis ratio.

Tantum abest, ut sine opera Spiritus sancti libero arbitrio conteramur seu mortificemur.

Confessio alia est, qua coram Deo agnoscimus peccatum et condemnamus nos ipsos.

Ea confessio non aliud nisi illa ipsa mortificatio et vera contritio est, de qua modo dicebam.

Atque hujus saepe Scriptura meminit.

I,: Si confiteamur peccata nostra, fidelis est et justus, ut remittat nobis peccata nostra.

Et David Ps.

L, s. : Quoniam iniquitatem meam ego cognosco et peccatum meum contra me est semper.

Tibi soli peccavi et malum coram te feci, ut justificeris in sermonibus tuis et vincas, cum judicaris.

Item Ps.

XXXI,: Dixi: confitebor adversum me injustitiam meam domino et tu remisisti impietatem peccati mei.

Citra hanc confessionem peccatum non condonatur.

Rursum non potest non condonari huic confessioni, nempe qua nos darnach Euseb.

kist.

eccl.

III,, Digitized by Google ipsos accusamus et damnamus, Deo gloriam veritatis et justitiae tribuimus.

Alia confessio est, qua nos non domi tantum apud nos, sed et coram aliis*, accusamus.

Haec quondam in ecclesia talis erat: Qui criminis alicujus reas erat, primum privatim a fratre quopiam, deinde coram ecclesia arguebatur.

Atque ibi condonabatur noxa resipiscenti.

Ejiciebatur ex ecclesia is, qui ecclesiam non audiebat.

Habes formam hujus confessionis Matth.

XVIH,, ubi usus clavium proditus est.

Nunc ejus exemplum in ecclesia nullum est, cum ad cohercenda vitia non alia ratio commodior esset.

Sed successit ei confessio illa, qua privatim et seorsum apud singulos presbyteros res agitur.

Et inter priscam illam confessionem et nostratem hoc interest, quod de publicis tantum et manifestis criminibus prisca agebatur, nostrate de secretis etiam agitur.

Vetustissimus mos fuit, accusari publica crimina coram universa ecclesia et totius ecclesiae suffragiis absolvi.

Is mos jam olim abrogatus est designatusque unus aliquis ex numero presbyterorum, coram quo privatim accusabantur quanquam publica crimina; is mulctam indicebat flagitiosis pro arbitria coram ecclesia, nempe pro publicis criminibus.

Nec ad synaxin admittebantur, nisi qui poena illa publica defuncti erant.

Ejus exemplum adhuc manet in publicis poenitentiis nostrorum temporum, cum homicidae in ecclesia plectuntur.

Hanc poenitentiae formam describit quisquis est Tripartitae, quam vocant, • Historiae auctor ), graecus ut apparet, aitque, Constantinopoli antiquatam, durare adhuc in ecclesiis occidentalibus estque ea, cujus saepe Cyprianus meminit.

Qui cum de publicorum criminum confessione loquitur, tarnen indicat eam coram sacerdote potius, quam universa ecclesia factam.

Require, si libet, ejus sermonem de lapsis.

Verba graeeae historiae subjiciam: »Visum est antiquis pontificibus, ut siodorus.

Die angeführte Stelle steht fast wörtlich dort IX,.

Digitized by Google »velut in theatro, sub testimonio ecclesiastici populi delicta »pandantur et hac causa presbyterum bonae conversationis »servantemque secreti ac sapientem virum designaverunt, »ad quem accedentes hi, qui deliquerant, delicta propria »fatebantur.

At ille secundum uniuscujusque culpam muletam »indicebat.

Quod etiam hactenus diligenter in occidenta* »libus servatur ecclesiis et maxime Romae, ubi etiam locus »est certus poenitentium, ubi stant rei, velut ii, qui lugent; »porro, ubi sacra celebratio impleta fuerit, illi, communio»nem non percipientes, cum gemitu et lamentatione seipsos »in terra prosternunt.

Ad quos accurrens episcopus, et ipse »cum lacrymis et gemitu spirituali procumbit et totius eccle»siae plebs illacrymatur.

Postea primus omnium consurgit »episcopus et jacentes erigit e terra.

Tum facta pro poeni»tentibus oratione dimittit omnes.

Interim illi se macerant »variis afflictionibus ex sententia episcopi.

Synaxeos tempus, »quod praescribit episcopus, exspectant.

Quo tempore, velut » »jam persoluto debito, una synaxi cum reliqua ecclesia par* »ticipant.

Haec Romani Pontifices ad nostra usque tem»pora observarunt.

Sed Constantinopoli tantisper presbyter »poenitentibus praefuit, dum mulier quaedam primae nobi»litatis post confessionem, in ecclesia poenitentiam agens, »cum diacono aliquoties concubuisset.

Quod ubi palam »factum est, adversus presbyteros coorta plebs est, quod »ecclesiam violassent.

Ibi Nectarius episcopus diaconum »officio dejecit et veterem poenitentium morem antiquavit, »nullo designato poenitentibus presbytero permisitque, ut »pro suae quisque conscientiae judicio participaret mensae »Domini, cum liberet.» Haec fere ad verbum Historia Tripartita.

Ex his colliges, duplicem formam publicae poenitentiae fuisse quondam: alteram primae ecclesiae, ubi coram universa ecclesia res gesta est et vel eiecti e communione fidelium flagitiosi qui resipere nolebant, vel absoluti, qui resipiebant.

Exemplum huius habes I.

et II.

de incesto; alteram, ubi poena publica est, confessio non Digitized by Google Loci commanes.

item.

Cuius exemplum hodie exstat in homicidarum poenitentia.

Poenae vero non debentur iure divino, sed a traditionibus humanis profectae sunt, ut postea dicam.

Et de hoc genere poenitentiae fere canones veteres loquuntur, quos ad privatam detorquent inepte fatui iuris pontificum professores.

Loci Communes Rerum Theologicarum companion

Pair doctrine with daily prayer

Chosen Portion gives your study a devotional anchor: one historic prayer and reading each day, free on iOS

Melanchthon insisted doctrine should end in piety; Chosen Portion supplies the daily devotional practice that study like this is meant to feed.

  • A 10-minute daily devotional rhythm to carry alongside your 5-week study
  • Prayers and texts from the same centuries you're reading about
  • Free install; day one's portion is waiting when you finish this plan's first reading
Chosen Portion — Daily Prayer (free iOS app)